Non-Theoretical Conspiracy

For future references: “Cultural Marxism” isn’t much of a conspiracy theory. It’s not as if the Frankfurt school can’t be verified to exist: it can.

-It is not in dispute who started the Frankfurt school:

Antonio Gramsci
Georg Lukács
Felix Weil

-It is not in dispute who the Frankfurt school’s most prominent academics were.

Herbert Marcuse
Theodor Adorno
Max Horkheimer
Walter Benjamin
Erich Fromm
Friedrich Pollock
Leo Löwenthal
Jürgen Habermas
Alfred Schmidt
Axel Honneth
Siegfried Kracauer
Otto Kirchheimer

-It is not in dispute what books were produced and spread by these academics.

Traditional and Critical Theory
Reason and Revolution
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Eclipse of Reason
Escape from Freedom
Minima Moralia
Eros and Civilization
One-Dimensional Man
Negative Dialectics
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere
The Theory of Communicative Action
Dialectic of Enlightenment

Ordinarily the term “conspiracy theory” refers to something you cannot prove and have no verifiable evidence of. In the case of Cultural Marxism: the facts of the issue are not disputed.

Leftist’s would like to exclaim that “cultural marxism” is a conspiracy theory: but actually it’s a pejorative, which is accurate, and leftists don’t like it. If you examine, for yourself – I invite you to, to examine SJW and Feminist ideologues, the people who write “Feminist theory” – you’ll find the same term come up quite a bit. “Critical Theory”, which was created by Max Horkheimer, one of the previous directors of the Institute for Social Research. Later added to by other academics of the Frankfurt school.

All of these culture warriors follow the doctrines and baseline ideology of the academics of a marxist think tank originally named “Institute for Social Research” which later became known as the “Frankfurt School” when they left germany and settled down in Colombia University. Critical theory, which is the doctrinal ideological background of the social justice warriors and culture warriors today, was quite literally created by marxist academics.

This is where you get the Feminist / SJW world view of society being one giant inter-sectional stack of varying forms of oppression.

When you can pick out a Feminist academic and go to her own course structure, look at her class description and point to the screen “critical theory” – it’s not a “conspiracy theory”. When that feminists own description of her course description specifically stipulates that she teaches a marxist oppression model conceptualization of society: it’s not a “conspiracy theory.” the act of referring to “cultural marxism” is simply an exorcise in asserting “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

Again: I invite you to do your own research. yet, just as an experiment… just for funzies….

Let’s look at the top 10 universities.

Ok, #1 is Princeton…. let’s look at Princeton.

Now looking at “Gender and Sexuality Studies“, we see that “Introduction to Gender and Sexuality Studies”, “Transgender Theory”, “Queer Theory”, and “Contemporary Theories of Gender and Sexuality” are all taught by Professor Gayle Salamon…

And also on Princeton’s official website….

Introduction to Critical Theory” is also taught by…. surprise… Professor Gayle Salamon…

Now…. when I can simply point to real life – verifiable – objective – reality: and point out “Critical Theory” was created by Marxist theorist Max Horkheimer who was director of the Institute for Social Research, and then I can point out that the same professor at the US’s #1 top ranked university, not only teaches “Introduction to Critical Theory” BUT ALSO teaches “Introduction to Gender and Sexuality Studies”, “Transgender Theory”, “Queer Theory”, and “Contemporary Theories of Gender and Sexuality”….

Is this a conspiracy theory: or an unavoidable observation to anyone willing to look?

That’s why leftists like to claim “Cultural Marxism” is a conspiracy theory, they want to discredit the concept in order that people do not bother to look: because the evidence is so easily found if one does.

I just proved “Cultural Marxism” is the driving force behind SJW ideology by simply picking a university, looking at the feminist professor who teaches their gender studies class and pointing out that she also teaches critical theory, which was created and developed by academics of the Frankfurt school.

That’s how easy it is to find the necessary evidence. I simply googled “top 10 universities

Saw that the #1 ranked school was Princeton, looked there, did a google search for “critical theory“.

Bob’s your uncle: looky looky looky – the same professor who teaches introduction to Princeton’s gender studies program, also teaches introduction to critical theory.

[sarcasm mode activate] Yeah that was horribly difficult. It took a lot out of me, I think I had to type a whole 100 individual letters, click my mouse maybe 5 times. truly an exhaustive investigation. I feel winded now, probably dehydrated too, maybe I should grab a gatorade. [sarcasm mode deactivate]

3088753134_30798fdb63_2Yep… “pay no attention to the marxist behind the curtain.”

Riley = Rapist: According to SJWs

According to the Rape / Sexual Assault rules promoted, lobbied for and passed on College Campuses across the US: Riley J. Dennis is unequivocally – a Rapist.

“I don’t think Riley is a bad person, okay? Like I feel like there is, you know, a genuine concern for trans rights, and it’s just being gone about in the wrong way.” Time code 1:061:20

No. Other people have freedom of choice. If R doesn’t want to have sex with Q: it is R’s right not to have sex with Q.

More over: for Q to attempt to guilt or shame R into having sex with Q is abuse.

Psychology Today: “How To Identify A Sexual Manipulator” Published May 19, 2015 by Gregory L. Jantz Ph.D.

“Through all of this behavior, the typical manipulator is smart and eloquent enough to deflect any initial resistance or objection to their overtures. Often, they will create explanations and excuses for their conduct, projecting the blame for any misunderstanding onto their target. The more off-guard they can make the target, and the more confused their target becomes, the better the atmosphere for the sexual manipulation. Exploiting naiveté, inexperience, uncertainty, and confusion is their game. Such responses can actually excite the sexual manipulator. Since most of us are not completely comfortable dealing with the sexual advances of others, sexual manipulators have a built-in advantage which they use to achieve their selfish goals.”

The Blaze: “University declares ’emotional manipulation’ to be rape” Published Dec 1, 2016 by Kaitlyn Schallhorn

“Coercion, as defined by the university, “is considered rape/sexual assault.”

“Coercion is the use of emotional manipulation to persuade someone to something they may not want to do — like being sexual or performing sexual acts,” the college’s website states.

“Being coerced into having sex or performing sexual acts is not consenting to having sex and is considered rape/sexual assault,” it continues.”

Bustle: “Is It Rape If You Say Yes? 5 Types Of Sexual Coercion, Explained” Published Apr 16 2015 by Eden Strong

“Sexual coercion is when tactics like pressure, trickery, or emotional force are used to get someone to agree to sex. It can be as as simple as encouraging someone to have a few too many drinks, or it can hide inside threats like “I’ll leave you if you don’t sleep with me.” But no matter what form it takes, sexual coercion isn’t just “a part of life” — it’s manipulative at best, and at worst, it’s abuse.”

Riley is engaged in emotional manipulation towards the goal of acquiring sexual conquest by means of emotional manipulation using guilt and shame as the active tactics. Riley is not a good person, Riley is an abuser.

More over, according to the rules set forth on many college campuses by Riley’s fellow Social Justice Warriors: Riley is a rapist.

Isn’t it lovely? The easiest way to denounce SJWs is by applying their own rules: to them. In which case they either need capitulate that the ideologically based rules and definitions which they support are wrong: or plead guilty to the very crimes those rules proclaim them to be guilty of.

It’s a beautiful thing. According to the Rape / Sexual Assault rules promoted, lobbied for and passed on College Campuses across the US: Riley J. Dennis is unequivocally – a Rapist.